April 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

« Second District, Division Eight holds (again) that Prop. 64 does NOT apply to pending cases | Main | "Blog's Demise May Chill Other Federal Lawyers' Online Comments" »

Thursday, November 17, 2005


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Recent trial court order declines to apply Prop. 64 retroactively:


Beth Ross

Further to your analysis of Judge Schwab's ruling in Estrada, please note that the Court distinquished Schwartz during oral argument for the reasons you articulate.
If his ruling is overturned on appeal we are certain that on remand he will certify the class, leaving in tact the injunction.

Kimberly A. Kralowec

Beth, thanks for the clarification.

The comments to this entry are closed.

2014 Supreme Court Calendar



  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.

  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2014
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.

  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad