The editor of Mealey's California Section 17200 Report was kind enough to send me the Branick reply brief on the merits. Also, thanks to the reader who forwarded the amicus brief of the California League for Environmental Enforcement Now in Mervyn's. The latter includes an interesting discussion of associational standing, and argues that the "and lost money or property" language should not be interpreted to require something more than the ordinary "injury in fact" standing rules require under Article III. Both of these briefs have been added to my list of Prop. 64 appellate briefs.