Today, the Supreme Court granted review in In re Tobacco II Cases, no. S147345, and issued a "grant and hold" order in Pfizer v. Superior Court, no. S145775. The "grant and hold" order in Pfizer reads:
Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in In re Tobacco II cases, S147345 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 282(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 29.1, is deferred pending further order of the court. Chin and Corrigan, JJ., are recused and did not participate. Votes: George, CJ., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar and Moreno, JJ.Because a statement of the issues to be reviewed in Tobacco is not yet available online, and because I haven't seen the briefs in Tobacco, I cannot say precisely how the issues overlap with Pfizer. If/when I get more information, I will, of course, post it. Meanwhile, the Court of Appeal opinions in Pfizer and Tobacco are both no longer citable as precedent.
Give please. I find it rather easy to portray a businessman. Being bland, rather cruel and incompetent comes naturally to me. Help me! There is an urgent need for sites: Learn about the stock market. I found only this - Stock market articles. How to mock your boss and keep your job at microsoft msft. Today, I want to revisit the strategy and show you how it would have worked over the last months, which have proved to be another absolutely brutal time for stock investors. Best regards :o, Ingmar from Arab.
Posted by: Ingmar | Thursday, August 13, 2009 at 11:33 AM