CONTACT ME


  • Kimberly A. Kralowec
    The Kralowec Law Group
    188 The Embarcadero,
    Suite 800
    San Francisco, CA 94105
    Tel: (415) 546-6800
    Fax: (415) 546-6801
    Web: www.kraloweclaw.com
    Email: uclpractitioner@gmail.com

April 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

« Top five reasons why the Supreme Court made Tobacco, not Pfizer, the lead case | Main | More on why full review was granted in Tobacco, not PFizer »

Thursday, November 02, 2006

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345172b069e200d834f7407c69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Tobacco petition for review and answer now available online:

Comments

Miranda Kolbe

How quickly does the Court usually rule on cases where it grants expedited review?

Kimberly

The Court has not yet ordered that review itself be expedited. So far, it has only expedited its consideration of the petition. I believe that if review is going to be expedited, we will see another order so indicating. And now that I've had a chance to read the petition for review, I see that it contains no request for expedited review. There must have been some procedural reason for deciding the Tobacco petition so quickly, probably relating to the limited time remaining to decide whether to grant review in Pfizer.

The comments to this entry are closed.

2014 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2014
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad