CONTACT ME


  • Kimberly A. Kralowec
    The Kralowec Law Group
    44 Montgomery Street,
    Suite 1210
    San Francisco, CA 94104
    Tel: (415) 546-6800
    Fax: (415) 546-6801
    Web: www.kraloweclaw.com
    Email: uclpractitioner@gmail.com

July 2015

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

« Supreme Court depublishes class certification decision: Sony Electronics, Inc. v. Superior Court (Hapner) | Main | "Limits on Liability" »

Friday, March 23, 2007

Comments

Kelly Y. Chen

I really have a hard time understanding Mr. Bosserman’s analysis with regard to the assertion that Pioneer Electronics “is most probably limited to purely commercial disputes.” I actually think there are effective ways to argue the opposite, assuming that the plaintiff’s counsel seeks only the names and addresses from the employer. I actually am in the process of writing a paper on this for a class at Hastings. Any suggestions/inputs from the plaintiffs’ bar would be greatly appreciated.

-Kelly Y. Chen, 3L

The comments to this entry are closed.

2015 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2015
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad