July 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Press Mentions

Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2008
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad

« Supreme Court grants review in another Prop. 64 "injury in fact" case: Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum | Main | California Attorney Guidelines for Civility and Professionalism »

Friday, August 17, 2007

New federal decision re catalyst theory: Trew v. Volvo Cars of N. Am., Inc.

In Trew v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLC, E.D. Cal., Civ. No. S-05-1379 RRB EFB (order filed 07/31/07), United States District Judge Ralph R. Beistline granted final approval of a class action settlement and awarded attorneys' fees under the catalyst theory. The court found that a CLRA notice letter (see Civ. Code § 1782) satisfied the pre-litigation demand requirement of Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 34 Cal.4th 553 (2004). Thanks to the blog reader who emailed me this order.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/454579/20778106

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New federal decision re catalyst theory: Trew v. Volvo Cars of N. Am., Inc.:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Research


California Law Blogs

More Law Blogs