May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Press Mentions

Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2008
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner



  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad

  • View Kimberly A. Kralowec's profile on LinkedIn



Support

this blog!

Tip Jar

« Supreme Court depublishes class certification opinion: Bell v. Superior Court (H.F. Cox, Inc.) | Main | New Seventh Circuit CAFA opinion: Springman v. AIG Marketing »

Saturday, April 26, 2008

"Class Action Lawsuits"

A blog called Disgusted Beyond Belief has an interesting post refuting the criticisms often levied against class action cases generally and the class action bar in particular. An excerpt:

Dealing with the [class action attorney's] fees [and] whether they are "deserved" - I say that they clearly are. Were it not for those fees, as noted above, the poor could be trod upon with impunity (as it is, they still often are, but it would be much much worse without [class action cases]). Putting together a class action suit is hard work that requires specialized lawyers with years of experience and also requires spending a lot of cash upfront on the part of the law firm. Only a large, rich law firm can handle class action suits for that reason. Veteran lawyers with highly specialized skills are needed. They don't come cheap, for good reason. They work hard, working long hours, sometimes for years, and all with the chance that in the end, they will get nothing. So the winning cases not only have to pay them for their time for those cases, they also have to cover all of the money spent on losing cases or on cases that, despite winning, still did not cover the cost of their actual time spent. In short, they deserve every penny - they work hard for it.

Thank you. I don't necessarily think that only a "rich, large law firm" can handle a class action case, but you definitely have to be persistent and very hard-working to succeed in this area of practice.

[Via ClassActionBlawg.com]

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/454579/28416682

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Class Action Lawsuits":

Comments

That's a good point - "large, rich law firm" was a poor choice of words, though I was trying to convey in layman's terms the notion that not just any attorney can file a class action and get it certified.

And I suppose the notion of what would even qualify as "rich" depends on what you compare it to. (People also tend to have the strange notion that all lawyers are rich or at least very well paid, when that is rather far from reality - and if it's not, I want to know where they've been hiding my cut).

Oh, and You're welcome.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Research


California Law Blogs

More Law Blogs