CONTACT ME


  • Kimberly A. Kralowec
    The Kralowec Law Group
    180 Montgomery Street,
    Suite 2000
    San Francisco, CA 94104
    Tel: (415) 546-6800
    Fax: (415) 546-6801
    Web: www.kraloweclaw.com
    Email: uclpractitioner@gmail.com

December 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

« New Ninth Circuit UCL "likely to deceive" decision: Williams v. Gerber Products Co. | Main | Supreme Court denies review and depublication in class certification case: Bell v. Superior Court (H.F. Cox, Inc.) »

Thursday, April 24, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345172b069e200e551f641bb8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New class action objector opinion: Chavez v. Netflix, Inc.:

Comments

Paul Herring

As a former Net-flix customer I was elated about getting a free month. I discontinued my account because I could no longer afford the service.

I call Netflix and cashed in on my free 16.99 three at a time subscription.

When the rep asked for a Credit card number he assured me my account would be free for 30 days.

He neglected to tell me that I would have to buy a month in order to get the free month. So it cost me $16 bucks to redeem my $16 award.

But, I guess as long as the lawyers got paid.
We showed them

The comments to this entry are closed.

2014 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2014
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad