CONTACT ME


  • Kimberly A. Kralowec
    Schubert Jonckheer Kolbe & Kralowec LLP
    Three Embarcadero Center,
    Suite 1650
    San Francisco, CA 94111
    Telephone: (415) 788-4220
    Facsimile: (415) 788-0161
    Email: uclpractitioner@gmail.com

About

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Categories

Recent Posts

ARCHIVES

FORMER SITE ARCHIVES

Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2009
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad

« California Blog of Appeal hosts Blawg Review | Main | New UCL restitution decision: Bradstreet v. Wong »

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Preliminary Final approval granted in Ford UCL/CLRA case

The Sacramento Bee reports this morning that Judge De Alba granted final approval yesterday of the settlement in the Ford case (Ford Explorer Cases, JCCP nos. 4266 & 4270). The article reports that only some of the plaintiffs' attorneys' fee requests were approved and that further briefing on the remaining fee requests is expected. Crystal Carreon, "Ford case settled except for legal fees," Sacramento Bee (Apr. 16, 2008).

UPDATE: The Daily Journal also has a story on the settlement: "Judge Approves Settlement of Suit Against Ford," Daily Journal (Apr. 17, 2008) (subscription).

Posted by Kimberly A. Kralowec at 12:30 PM in News reports and practice articles |

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345172b069e200e551ef11b78834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Preliminary Final approval granted in Ford UCL/CLRA case:

» Coupon-only settlements are hard to sell from the complex litigator
Class action attorney is now routinely used as a pejorative. Although a certain amount of the taint attached to class action attorneys certainly stems from marketing efforts by big business (another term now used as a pejorative), which has the [Read More]

Tracked on Monday, April 21, 2008 at 05:27 PM

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

Posted by:  | 

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Upcoming Events

CAOC CORNER

Research


The UCL

Class Actions

The CLRA

Proposition 64

California Appellate Practice Links

California Law Blogs

Consumer and Class Action Law Blogs

More Law Blogs

LAW BLOG DIRECTORIES