CONTACT ME


  • Kimberly A. Kralowec
    The Kralowec Law Group
    180 Montgomery Street,
    Suite 2000
    San Francisco, CA 94104
    Tel: (415) 546-6800
    Fax: (415) 546-6801
    Web: www.kraloweclaw.com
    Email: uclpractitioner@gmail.com

August 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

« Craigslist sues eBay for UCL violations | Main | Informal talk on law blogs at next week's BASF Appellate Practice Section meeting »

Thursday, May 22, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345172b069e200e552269c408833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference State Bar's annual UCL conference: Judge Kramer's remarks:

Comments

AS

Some of his ideas seem contrary to Cash Call (both in terms of trend and the notion that class discovery will not be allowed where the plaintiff never had standing), although I guess it begs the question whether Cash Call will end up being an outlier case.

Kimberly A. Kralowec

He did not mention CashCall by name during his remarks. I agree that CashCall supports the argument that in at least some cases in which the plaintiffs never had standing, discovery would still be appropriate.

The comments to this entry are closed.

2014 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2014
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad