CONTACT ME


  • Kimberly A. Kralowec
    Schubert Jonckheer Kolbe & Kralowec LLP
    Three Embarcadero Center,
    Suite 1650
    San Francisco, CA 94111
    Telephone: (415) 788-4220
    Facsimile: (415) 788-0161
    Email: uclpractitioner@gmail.com

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2009
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad

« Recent Ninth Circuit UCL decision: Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. | Main | More briefs from Fairbanks v. Superior Court »

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

"L.A. Targets Insurers With Unlikely Law"

Today's Daily Journal has an article, "L.A. Targets Insurers With Unlikely Law" (subscription) reporting on a group of UCL actions recently filed by the City Attorney of Los Angeles against a number of insurers for cancelling their customers' health insurance policies after a signficant claim is made:

Criminal probes, injunctions and misdemeanor charges - if these are the bread and butter of any big city prosecutor looking for career-propelling headlines, Los Angeles City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo has certainly gobbled his fair share.

But behind the scenes, the Los Angeles city attorney's office has increasingly replaced flashier criminal charges with less common civil litigation aimed at nailing companies for unfair business practices.

Nowhere has this unusual legal strategy played a more crucial role than in Delgadillo's widespread investigation of the health insurance industry. Recent lawsuits against the state's top insurers all rely on a broad and controversial law that gives prosecutors statewide powers to sue companies for perceived abuses, exposing them to hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties.

Invoking the lesser known statute instead of criminal charges holds appeal because a wide range of sanctions can be sought in cases which might not meet the high burden of proof required in criminal complaints, according to prosecutors.

Some of the recently-filed complaints can be accessed at this link. The complaint against Blue Shield was particularly well done.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345172b069e200e553fe72218834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "L.A. Targets Insurers With Unlikely Law":

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Research


California Law Blogs