« New UCL/CLRA choice-of-law decision: Brack v. Omni Loan Co. | Main | New Third Circuit preemption decision: Fellner v. Tri-Union Seafoods, L.L.C. »
In Yabsley v. Cingular Wireless, LLC, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Aug. 18, 2008), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Six) held that an administrative regulation (specifically, a provision of the California Code of Regulations) can provide a Cel-Tech "safe harbor" for conduct that might otherwise violate the UCL.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345172b069e200e5540f57688834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New UCL "safe harbor" decision: Yabsley v. Cingular Wireless, LLC:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments