December 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2008
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad

« "The Blog and Short of It" | Main | Merits briefs from Supreme Court CLRA case: Fairbanks v. Superior Court »

Monday, August 11, 2008

Supreme Court sets attorneys' fees case for oral argument: Vasquez v. Superior Court

The Supreme Court has set Vasquez v. Superior Court, no. S143710, for oral argument on September 3, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. in San Francisco. The Court will be deciding this issue:

Does the rule that, in order to receive attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, the plaintiff must first reasonably attempt to settle the matter short of litigation, apply to this case? (See Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2004) 34 Cal.4th 553, 557; Grimsley v. Board of Supervisors (1985) 169 Cal.App.3d 960, 966-967.)

The Court of Appeal determined that the party opposing the fee award waived that issue by not raising it below. Vasquez v. State of California, 138 Cal.App.4th 550 (2006) (Fourth Appellate District, Division Two).

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/454579/32146244

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Supreme Court sets attorneys' fees case for oral argument: Vasquez v. Superior Court:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

CAOC CORNER

Research


California Law Blogs

More Law Blogs