CONTACT ME


  • Kimberly A. Kralowec
    The Kralowec Law Group
    44 Montgomery Street,
    Suite 1210
    San Francisco, CA 94104
    Tel: (415) 546-6800
    Fax: (415) 546-6801
    Web: www.kraloweclaw.com
    Email: uclpractitioner@gmail.com

August 2015

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

« Oral argument reports: Arias and Amalgamated | Main | Blog hiatus »

Monday, April 13, 2009

Comments

Jeffrey Wilens

This was a stupid argument by plaintiff's counsel on the PAGA issue. I hope her argument is just being oversimplified by the reporter. The UCL language (pre-Prop 64) allowing non-class representative actions is almost identical to the PAGA language allowing non-class representative actions. This point should have been hammered down by the plaintiff's counsel. I hope it was.

Also the reporter minimizes the harm of requiring class cert for PAGA. Many court's won't certify meal and rest claims, but similar relief can be obtained under non-class PAGA actions.

The comments to this entry are closed.

2015 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2015
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad