CONTACT ME


  • Kimberly A. Kralowec
    The Kralowec Law Group
    44 Montgomery Street,
    Suite 1210
    San Francisco, CA 94104
    Tel: (415) 546-6800
    Fax: (415) 546-6801
    Web: www.kraloweclaw.com
    Email: uclpractitioner@gmail.com

June 2015

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

« Supreme Court preserves UCL class actions in In re Tobacco II Cases | Main | "In Loss for Big Tobacco, Calif. Supreme Court Loosens Standing to Sue Under Proposition 64" »

Monday, May 18, 2009

Comments

Andy Hoffman

Thanks for covering this important story. For those of us who have been following the saga of Prop. 64 from its inception, the high court's ruling was a very welcome one indeed. http://tinyurl.com/qenqgv

As the majority stated, to have ruled otherwise would have been tantamount to ending consumers' right to mount class-action lawsuits in California.

The comments to this entry are closed.

2015 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2015
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad