CONTACT ME


  • Kimberly A. Kralowec
    The Kralowec Law Group
    180 Montgomery Street,
    Suite 2000
    San Francisco, CA 94104
    Tel: (415) 546-6800
    Fax: (415) 546-6801
    Web: www.kraloweclaw.com
    Email: uclpractitioner@gmail.com

January 2015

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

« Enhanced remedies in UCL actions brought by senior citizens: Clark v. Superior Court (Nat'l Western Life Ins. Co.) | Main | Recent Ninth Circuit class-action-related decisions: Chalk v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., Hunt v. Imperial Merchant Services, Inc., Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp., and Hatfield v. Halifax PLC »

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345172b069e201157053d3a2970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference OFF-TOPIC BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court upholds Prop. 8: Strauss v. Horton:

Comments

AndytheLawyer

Maybe this could be deemed on topic if heterosexual marriage could be postured as unfairly competing with non-heterosexual marriage -- at least in a non-consumer context. After all, both goods and services are involved, as well as all sorts of enjoinable representations.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2015
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad