CONTACT ME


  • Kimberly A. Kralowec
    The Kralowec Law Group
    180 Montgomery Street,
    Suite 2000
    San Francisco, CA 94104
    Tel: (415) 546-6800
    Fax: (415) 546-6801
    Web: www.kraloweclaw.com
    Email: uclpractitioner@gmail.com

June 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

« Two new opinions on class settlement objections: Consumer Privacy Cases and Clark v. American Residential Services LLC | Main | U.S. Supreme Court takes up CAFA case: Hertz v. Friend »

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345172b069e2011570dab567970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New Ninth Circuit UCL/CLRA pleading decision: Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.:

Comments

Andrew Sussman

Of particular interest is that Kearns affirmed the dismissal of UCL and CLRA claims that were "grounded in fraud" even though they also had pled alternative, non-fraud grounds (e.g. UCL unfairness) for relief.

What is now clear is that in federal court any fraud-based claim must be pled, separately and with FRCP 9(b) specificity, against each of multiple defendants -- regardless of the claim's formal cause of action or basis.

The comments to this entry are closed.

2014 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2014
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad