CONTACT ME


  • Kimberly A. Kralowec
    The Kralowec Law Group
    44 Montgomery Street,
    Suite 1210
    San Francisco, CA 94104
    Tel: (415) 546-6800
    Fax: (415) 546-6801
    Web: www.kraloweclaw.com
    Email: uclpractitioner@gmail.com

August 2015

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

« Supreme Court announcement re court closure days | Main | New class certification decision: Ali v. U.S.A. Cab Ltd. »

Monday, August 24, 2009

Comments

TommyK

Have other cases before this held that the safe harbor applies in "unlawful" prong cases and not just "unfair" prong cases? Given this is dicta, but it seems to say that it applies in both:

"Although section 17200 broadly prescribes 'any unlawful, unfair or fraudulent business act or practice,' it does not apply when specific legislation provides a 'safe harbor' for the conduct at issue. When specific legislation provides a 'safe harbor,' a plaintiff may not use the general UCL to assault that harbor. If the Legislature has permitted certain conduct or considered a situation and concluded that no action should lie, courts may not override that determination."

The comments to this entry are closed.

2015 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2015
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad