CONTACT ME


  • Kimberly A. Kralowec
    The Kralowec Law Group
    180 Montgomery Street,
    Suite 2000
    San Francisco, CA 94104
    Tel: (415) 546-6800
    Fax: (415) 546-6801
    Web: www.kraloweclaw.com
    Email: uclpractitioner@gmail.com

June 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

« Pfizer v. Superior Court (Galfano) to be argued this morning | Main | New opinion addresses responsibility of class counsel post-judgment: Barboza v. West Coast Digital GSM, Inc. »

Tuesday, December 08, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345172b069e20120a71f8fe5970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More on Davis v. Ford Motor Credit Co.: the attorneys' fees holding:

Comments

Andrew Sussman

One solution to this problem = amend CCP Sec. 1021.5 to permit a defendant's recovery of fees in UCL cases, like those permitted by CC Sec. 1780(e) for CLRA cases prosecuted in bad faith.

The comments to this entry are closed.

2014 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2014
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad