Here are more materials from Weinstat v. Dentsply, no. S180179:
- Letter Supporting Review of American Honda Motor Co. (dated 03/12/10)
- Reply to Answer to Petition for Review (filed 03/12/10)
- Letter Supporting Review of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce et al. (dated 03/18/10)
The reply brief (at p. 2) cites this blog and this blog post in particular. That's the post where I listed the nine post-Tobacco II decisions handed down to date.
As the reply brief notes, I did say that the opinions were difficult to reconcile, but I did not say it was impossible. And while I appreciate being described to the Supreme Court as a "prominent UCL commentator," I do not support the petition for review in Weinstat.