« Supreme Court denies review in two more post-Tobacco II cases |
| Thoughts on one aspect of Dukes v. Wal-Mart »
Attorney Steven G. Pearl of The California Wage and Hour Law Blog has had more time to read Dukes v. Wal-Mart than I have. He has three detailed posts on the opinion.
Also, a post at a Forbes.com blog called On The Docket discusses the case and asks if Wal-Mart should really be considered "too big to sue."
Posted by Kimberly A. Kralowec at 09:51 PM | Permalink
It's just that my case against Wal-Mart, Sepulveda v. Wal-Mart, has been stayed pending Dukes, so I have a little extra interest in it!
Steven G. Pearl |
Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:18 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.
Enter your email address:
Delivered by FeedBurner