CONTACT ME


  • Kimberly A. Kralowec
    The Kralowec Law Group
    180 Montgomery Street,
    Suite 2000
    San Francisco, CA 94104
    Tel: (415) 546-6800
    Fax: (415) 546-6801
    Web: www.kraloweclaw.com
    Email: uclpractitioner@gmail.com

August 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

« Supreme Court addresses contingency-fee arrangements in County of Santa Clara v. Superior Court (Atlantic Richfield Co.) | Main | New class settlement decision: In re Cellphone Fee Termination Cases »

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345172b069e2013485bef553970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New UCL attorneys' fees decision: Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc.:

Comments

Charles Jung

Nice post. Kirby is a very important case, and putative wage & hour plaintiffs will need to think twice before including a meal or rest break claim. I discuss the case myself in my humble new wage & hour blog: http://wagehour.wordpress.com

Best,
Charles

The comments to this entry are closed.

2014 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2014
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad