CONTACT ME


  • Kimberly A. Kralowec
    The Kralowec Law Group
    188 The Embarcadero,
    Suite 800
    San Francisco, CA 94105
    Tel: (415) 546-6800
    Fax: (415) 546-6801
    Web: www.kraloweclaw.com
    Email: uclpractitioner@gmail.com

April 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

« "Supremes Hand Win to Workers with Google Age Bias Ruling" | Main | BASF program today: Strategies for Growing Your Practice »

Monday, August 09, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345172b069e20134860c6687970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Supreme Court to hand down two opinions of interest today: Clark v. Superior Court and Lu v. Hawaiian Gardens:

Comments

rb

Re Lu, I would say Justice Chin is 0/2 on UCL cases. This and Cel-Tech very poorly reasoned. He analyzes the legislative history of the statute in issue, but not the legislative and judicial history of the UCL itself, which clearly was intended to cover this kind of situation. Clearly, the acts alleged are unlawful, as is conversion and both should properly tether this to an unlawfulness prong case.

The comments to this entry are closed.

2014 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2014
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad