Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted review in Rose v. Bank of America, no. S199074. In that case, the Court of Appeal held that a UCL "unlawful" prong claim could not be predicated on alleged violations of the federal Truth in Savings Act (TISA), 12 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq. Rose v. Bank of America, N.A., 200 Cal.App.4th 1441 (2011).
The opinion's discussion of the UCL's "unlawful" prong and the scope of the Cel-Tech "safe harbor" was quite interesting. My original blog post on Rose is here.
The Supreme Court docket has not yet been updated with a description of the issue(s) on review.