« Tomorrow's Brinker program CANCELLED |
| New class arbitration opinion: Nelsen v. Legacy Partners Residential, Inc. »
Many thanks to the blog reader who forwarded the answer brief on the merits filed last week in Rose v. Bank of America, no. S199074.
Posted by Kimberly A. Kralowec at 05:00 AM in UCL - "unfair" prong, UCL - "unlawful" prong, UCL - Supreme Court | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345172b069e2017743749108970d
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Answer brief on the merits filed in Rose v. Bank of America:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
(You can use HTML tags like <b> <i> and <ul> to style your text.)
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Name is required to post a comment
Please enter a valid email address
Enter your email address:
Delivered by FeedBurner