The opinion does not address the issue taken up by the en banc Ninth Circuit panel in Kilgore, namely, whether UCL claims for public injunctive relief remain inarbitrable after Concepcion.
« U.S. Supreme Court denies cert. in post-Dukes case: McReynolds v. Merrill Lynch | Main | 22nd Annual Golden State Antitrust and UCL Institute, Thursday, October 25, 2012 in San Francisco »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345172b069e2017d3c75962d970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Another new consumer arbitration opinion: Phillips v. Sprint PCS:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments