CONTACT ME


  • Kimberly A. Kralowec
    The Kralowec Law Group
    44 Montgomery Street,
    Suite 1210
    San Francisco, CA 94104
    Tel: (415) 546-6800
    Fax: (415) 546-6801
    Web: www.kraloweclaw.com
    Email: uclpractitioner@gmail.com

July 2017

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

« Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure proposed amendments to Rule 23 | Main | Ninth Circuit declines to enforce no-class-action abitration clause in employment contract: Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP »

Tuesday, August 23, 2016

Comments

Charles Carreon

Now that's some meaningful advocacy for consumers. And I side with the Supreme Court's decision. Whenever there is "affirmance on other grounds but not on those relied on by the trial court," the appellate court is in questionable territory.

The comments to this entry are closed.

2017 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2017
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.

  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad



  • StatCounter