"Circuit's reversal in wage case complicates Comcast," Daily Journal (May 29, 2013) ("'[T]he opinion debunks a myth that developed, already, around Comcast, which is this notion that individual damage questions can defeat class certification,' said Kimberly A. Kralowec, a plaintiffs' attorney at the Kralowec Law Group in San Francisco. 'The U.S. Supreme Court did not in fact change anything about the law regarding individual damage questions.'")
"Court deals setback to Wal-Mart contractor in employment litigation," Daily Journal (March 29, 2013) ("Kimberly A. Kralowec ... said courts don't make rulings limiting communication with opposing parties lightly. 'That sort of order is not something that would be issued unless the court found that there was a real risk of abuse ...,' she said.")
"2013 California Lawyer Attorneys of the Year," California Lawyer (March 2013) ("Lauded by both plaintiff and defense employment bars, the California Supreme Court's unanimous April decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (53 Cal. 4th 1004 (2012)) resolved years of uncertainty by setting out definitive guidance on the often-litigated issue of the amount and timing of meal and rest periods for nonexempt employees. Kralowec ... argued for the plaintiffs before the high court.")
"Depublication of employment appellate rulings stirs curiosity," Daily Journal (January 30, 2013) ("Kimberly A. Kralowec of the Kralowec Law Group filed a depublication request for each of the three cases in question .... She asserts the decisions misstated the Supreme Court's analysis in Brinker ....")
"High Court Queues Up Number of Post-Brinker Cases," The Recorder (January 7, 2013) ("Kimberly Kralowec of The Kralowec Law Group said in both rulings the Second District had 'misinterpreted the Brinker decision, in particular what employers have to do to comply with their meal period obligations.' Depublishing, she said, 'was a very strong signal that the court disagreed with the analysis' in those two cases.")
"Suit Over Farmers 'Short Rate' Policy Revived," Insurance Law360 (December 21, 2012) ("Kimberly Kralowec of The Kralowec Law Group, who represents the plaintiffs, told Law360 on Friday that she and her team were very happy with the ruling. 'We think that it shows that insurers cannot use technical language buried in the fine print of an insurance contract without disclosing what that language means to its policyholders,' Kralowec said.")
"Top Labor & Employment Lawyers," Daily Journal (July 16, 2012)
"Top Women Lawyers," Daily Journal (May 9, 2012)
"Employer liability for rest breaks clarified by high court," Daily Journal, April 13, 2012
"Employment bar anticipates Brinker decision," Daily Journal, April 9, 2012 ("'I think the class certification issues are pretty straight forward and that the trial judge's certification order was well supported by California law,' said Kimberly Kralowec of The Kralowec Law Group in San Francisco, one of the attorneys who represented the restaurant workers before the Supreme Court.")
"Class Dismissed," California Lawyer, April 2012 ("Others in the plaintiffs bar contend the panel's decision [in Mazza v. American Honda] is just wrong-headed. 'I think that the decision misapplies California choice of law rules and misapplies the UCL,' says Kimberly A. Kralowec, a specialist in UCL litigation for the Kralowec Law Group in San Francisco.")
"State supreme court takes up class-action waivers in the post-Concepcion era," Daily Journal, March 23, 2012 ("'It's good that we will be getting relatively early word from the [state] Supreme Court on what Concepcion means,' said Kimberly Kralowec of the Kralowec Law Group, an expert in consumer class actions.")
"Brief: Brinker ruling should apply to past, future cases," Daily Journal, January 5, 2012 ("Plaintiffs' lawyer Kimberly A. Kralowec said [a prospective-only] ruling would not be acceptable.")
"Workers Urge Retroactive Ruling In Brinker Meal Break Case," Employment Law360, January 5, 2012 ("The plaintiffs are represented by Michael Rubin of Altshuler Berzon LLP, Kimberly Kralowec of the Kralowec Law Group, Timothy Cohelan and Michael Singer of Cohelan Khoury & Singer, L. Tracee Lorens and Wayne Hughes of Lorens & Associates PLC and William Turley of the Turley Law Firm PLC.")
"Employment Cases to Watch in 2012," Employment Law360 (January 2, 2012)
"Attorney hopes high court takes up case against AIG," Daily Journal, December 20, 2011 ("A San Francisco plaintiffs' attorney who specializes in Unfair Competition Law cases agreed ... that the court misapplied Kwikset. 'The complaint alleged that the plaintiffs' annuities lost value as a direct result of AIG's misconduct, which led to its near-collapse,' said Kimberly Kralowec of the Kralowec Law Group. 'That should be enough to satisfy the UCL's standing requirement as interpreted in Kwikset.'")
"Calif. Top Court Asked to Mull 'Rolling 5' in Brinker Case," Employment Law360 (December 6, 2011) ("Kimberly Kralowec, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said that ... [u]nder the defendants' take on the law, '[employers] could require people to take lunch at nine in the morning and then work for nine hours.'")
"Brinker at the Supreme Court," The Recorder, November 15, 2011 ("Kimberly Kralowec, representing the real party in interest workers, said that the provisions could be harmonized, but if the court were to conclude otherwise, the wage order could provide greater protections to employees than the statute.")
"The end of an era: Meal break case finally heard by state Supreme Court," Daily Journal, November 10, 2011 ("I half expected to see plaintiffs' lawyers dressed up in a Yoda costume with a placard declaring 'Use the Force Kim,' (Kim Kralowec, lawyer for the employees) ....")
"Justices skeptical of mandatory meal breaks," Daily Journal, November 9, 2011 ("The justices seemed skeptical of plaintiffs' lawyer Kimberly A. Kralowec's argument that companies have to force the employees to take breaks at certain intervals for health and safety reasons ... [but] pressed [Brinker's lawyer] about the [IWC] wage orders, which indicate that employees can't be required to work more than five consecutive hours without a meal break.")
"High Court Leans Toward in Employers in Brinker," The Recorder, November 9, 2011 ("Lawyers watching the oral arguments on Tuesday sensed the court will most likely issue a nuanced ruling.")
"California high court hears debate over worker breaks," San Francisco Chronicle, November 8, 2011 ("The workers' attorney Kimberly Kralowec said the same rules controlling overtime work were at play.")
"Calif. Top Court Mulls Meal Break Standard In Brinker Suit," Employment Law360, November 8, 2011 ("Kimberly Kralowec of The Kralowec Law Group, an attorney for the plaintiffs, ... drew a parallel between meal break obligations and overtime pay rules, and said that companies should make employees stop working to take required meal breaks just like companies prohibit employees from working unsanctioned overtime hours.")
"California Supreme Court tackles workplace break rules," San Jose Mercury News, November 6, 2011 ("Kim Kralowec, a lawyer for Alvarado and other Brinker employees, said that is why her clients have been fighting for eight years in the courts. 'The reality is, if meal periods are optional, very few workers are going to get them,' she said.")
"Calif. High Court To Hear Long-Awaited Meal Break Case," Employment Law360, November 4, 2011 ("Kimberly Kralowec of The Kralowec Law Group will argue for the plaintiffs on Tuesday.")
"Sleeper issue buried in Brinker: Plaintiffs' lawyers seek to use statistics and surveys to prove claims," Daily Journal, October 17, 2011 ("'What we're looking to see is for the Supreme Court to come back and reaffirm these public policies,' said Michael D. Singer of Cohelan, Khoury & Singer, co-counsel for the plaintiffs with Kimberly A. Kralowec of the Kralowec Law Group.")
"Meal Breaks: Waiting for Brinker," California Lawyer, August 2011 ("The 'make available' versus 'ensure' debate between the appellate districts is the question everyone wants answered, says Kralowec, principal at the Kralowec Law Group in San Francisco.")
"Employment lawyers continue to wait for Brinker decision," Daily Journal, July 19, 2011 ("Kimberly A. Kralowec of The Kralowec Law Group, who represents the plaintiffs in the Brinker case, said she's more concerned about the outcome than how long it takes the court to decide. 'I don't want them to rush it if they need the time,' she said. 'I want it to be done right.'")
"California Top Court Says ‘Labels Matter’; Fleshes Out Prop 64 Standing Requirements," BNA Class Action Litigation Report, February 11, 2011 ("'This decision is correct on the law and it will ensure that the UCL isn’t completely gutted as a consumer protection tool'—a result consistent with the voters’ intention in adopting Proposition 64, Kimberly A. Kralowec, a plaintiffs’ attorney at The Kralowec Law Group and author of the blog, The UCL Practitioner, told BNA.")
"Federal Bench Takes Lead on Meal Cases," Daily Journal, February 2, 2011 ("'We're seeing federal judges having a big impact on developing state law,' said Kimberly Kralowec of the Kralowec Law Group ....")
"Courts Take Conflicting Views on Breaks," Daily Journal, November 2, 2010 ("'We've got two court of appeal panels down the hall from each other, saying they're going to go ahead and issue orders, but initially felt [their] opinions shouldn't be published,' said Kimberly Kralowec of the Kralowec Law Group, co-counsel for plaintiffs in Brinker. 'Then one court granted publication request[s] ....'")
"Price-Fixing Defense Gets Thumbs Down," Daily Journal, July 13, 2010 ("The ruling [in Clayworth v. Pfizer] will help consumers pursue class action lawsuits brought under the Unfair Competition Law (UCL), said Kimberly Kralowec of the Kralowec Law Group in San Francisco.")
"OC Files Suit Against Toyota," Daily Journal, March 15, 2010 ("Kimberly A. Kralowec, a San Francisco lawyer and blogger on 17200 litigation, said such arrangements with outside counsel 'may be the only way public prosecutors' offices can handle some of the cases they should be bringing.'")
"S.F. Lawyer Sets Up Own Shop," Daily Journal, March 8, 2010 ("Kimberly Kralowec left San Francisco plaintiffs' law firm Schubert Jonckheer Kolbe & Kralowec to hang out her own shingle as The Kralowec Law Group. She handles plaintiff-side class actions, including lawsuits filed under California's unfair competition law.")
"Lower Courts Chip at Tobacco Ruling," Daily Journal, January 19, 2010 ("'This trend, if it continues, will roll back the law to certainly pre-Tobacco II days and even pre-Mervyn's days,' said San Francisco attorney Kimberly Kralowec. She was referring to the court's first crack at Prop. 64, when it proclaimed that the measure did not make substantive changes to consumer protection law. Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn's, (2006) 39 Cal.4th 223.")
"Court Applies Tobacco II: Prop 64 Changed Standing Requirements, Not Substantive Law," BNA Class Action Litigation Report, October 9, 2009 ("Kimberly A. Kralowec ... told BNA that [Morgan v. AT&T Wireless] was the most significant case to date to interpret the Tobacco II holdings. She said that while the Morgan decision does not contain new holdings, it serves to illustrate and confirm the holdings in Tobacco II.")
"Class Action Appellate Report," Forum, May/June 2009 ("As CAOC Board member Kimberly Kralowec noted on her blog, The UCL Practitioner, 'The bargain was for a product Made in the U.S.A. The plaintiffs were induced to make a purchase and did not get what they paid for, not by any stretch. That is why misrepresentations about geographic origin are prohibited in the first place.'")
"California Family Fitness sued over women-only areas," Sacramento Business Journal, May 1, 2009 ("People would not tolerate men-only clubs, and it took many years and efforts by women to stop discrimination against women, Kralowec said. 'It’s the same situation.'")
"Justices Restrict Fine-Print Lawsuits," The Daily Journal, January 30, 2009 ("[O]ther plaintiffs' attorneys said they worry that the ruling will discourage people from bringing legitimate lawsuits. 'I think it's a significant problem when companies insert unconscionable provisions into their contracts and apparently no one can sue to stop them from doing that,' said Kimberly A. Kralowec of Schubert Jonckheer Kolbe & Kralowec in San Francisco.")
"Does 'Satisfaction Guaranteed' Actually Mean Anything? Yes, or your money back!" Slate, December 19, 2008
"Farmers Insurance Fends Off $115 Million Verdict, For Now," The Daily Journal, Dececember 11, 2008 ("San Francisco attorney Kimberly A. Kralowec, who blogs on California's unfair competition law, said this may be the first opinion to specifically require 'causation' as an element of standing.")
"California Supreme Court to Take Up Meal and Rest Break Case," The Daily Journal, October 23, 2008 ("'I'm very pleased and particularly glad that the Court of Appeal opinion is no longer a citable precedent in California courts,' said Kimberly Ann Kralowec of Schubert Jonckheer Kolbe & Kralowec in San Francisco, who argued on behalf of the workers.")
"Supremes Take 'Brinker' Break Case," The Recorder, October 23, 2008 ("Kimberly Kralowec, a partner with San Francisco's Schubert Jonckheer Kolbe & Kralowec and one of the attorneys representing workers who sued Brinker Restaurant Corp., was elated by the Supreme Court's decision. 'The primary meal period compliance question is an issue that has been raised and actively litigated in dozens of cases in state court and federal court,' she said Wednesday. 'The Brinker ruling created a split of authority. Now the Supreme Court will sort it out.'")
"California Supreme Court to Consider Meal Break Case," Employment Law360, October 23, 2008 ("'I was optimistic that they might take the case up and obviously was very pleased that they decided to do so,' Kralowec said. 'It's a good day for California workers.'")
"Strong Female Voices in the Legal Blogosphere," Law.com, October 6, 2008
"L.A. Targets Insurers With Unlikely Law," The Daily Journal, August 13, 2008 ("Legal observers said that Delgadillo has wielded those unusual powers in an unprecedented manner compared with district attorneys and other city prosecutors. 'I think it is significant. I haven't seen other city attorneys using this tool in what appears to be such a concerted and organized effort against an industry,' said Kimberly Kralowec, a partner with Schubert, Jonckheer, Kolbe & Kralowec in San Francisco. 'It reminds me more about what you might see the state attorney general doing,' Kralowec, who edits a blog devoted to Unfair Competition Law, said.")
"Panel Rejects Class Status for Meal Breaks," The Daily Journal, July 23, 2008 ("But Kimberly A. Kralowec, a partner in the San Francisco law firm of Schubert Jonckheer Kolbe & Kralowec, who represented the workers, downplayed the precedential nature of the ruling. She said appeals court[s] have split on the issue and it would have to be resolved by the state Supreme Court. She called the ruling 'a disaster for California employees.'")
"Workers Can't Catch a Break from Calif. Court," The Recorder, July 23, 2008 (“Kimberly Kralowec, a partner with San Francisco's Schubert Jonckheer Kolbe & Kralowec who handled part of the case against the Brinker Restaurant Corp., called the ruling 'a horrible decision for employees.' 'It will mean that workers are going to be much less likely to get their meal breaks,' she said, adding that she and co-counsel plan to seek review by the California Supreme Court.")
“Lawyer Sues Google Over Ad Placement,” The Recorder, July 18, 2008 (“If Kralowec's name sounds familiar, it may be because she is the longtime author of two legal blogs, The UCL Practitioner, a blog about unfair competition law and class actions in California, and The Appellate Practitioner, a blog about appellate practice in California and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.”) (reprinted from Legal Blog Watch)
“Google Sued for Selling Ads on Parked Domains,” InformationWeek, July 15, 2008 (“In seeking class certification for the lawsuit, Levitte’s attorneys hope to represent other aggrieved Google advertisers. ‘We believe it’s a problem that affects all [Google’s] advertisers equally,’ said Kimberly Kralowec, partner at the law firm representing Levitte.”)
“Livin' la vida blawga and staying within ethical bounds,” Plaintiff Magazine (July 2008) (“Kimberly A. Kralowec, a partner in the San Francisco firm of Schubert Jonckheer Kolbe & Kralowec and a longtime legal blogger, [says,] ‘Regardless of what you say in your blog, no attorney-client relationship is created under the California rules of ethics.’”)
“Big Tech for Small Firms,” California Lawyer (July 2008) (“If you have a very specific area of interest in law, one that can help make your firm stand out from the crowd, a well-written blog can be a provocative attention getter and a potential rainmaker. One example of a well-done blog is The UCL Practitioner, written by San Francisco class action attorney Kimberly A. Kralowec. It has a very tight focus — California's Unfair Competition Law — and is updated frequently.”)
“The Search for Intelligent Life in the Blogosphere,” California Lawyer (May 2008) (“For instance, if Williams needs an update on developments in California's Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200-17209), he goes straight to The UCL Practitioner (www.uclpractitioner.com). ‘I look there if I need to know the latest in the law,’ Williams says of the blog written by Kimberly A. Kralowec, a partner at Schubert & Reed in San Francisco. ‘I can count on Kimberly for that.’”)
“Debate Heats Up Over Unpublished Opinions,” California Lawyer (May 2008) (“Kimberly Kralowec, an appeals attorney at San Francisco's Schubert & Reed, agrees that a change would mean extra work for lawyers. But she also finds some truth to the claim that the state Supreme Court is much less likely to grant review of unpublished decisions. ‘I can hear the frustration that is coming through in [the Hild] complaint,’ says Kralowec, who blogs at The Appellate Practitioner. ‘Whether it rises to a constitutional violation is a different story.’”)
“$15.6M Awarded In San Francisco Newspaper Clash,” Competition Law 360, March 6, 2008 (“Kimberly A. Kralowec, a partner at Schubert & Reed LLP in San Francisco, said the jury's finding that the Weekly violated California's Unfair Practices Act could be a predicate for a finding by the judge that the defendant also violated the ‘unlawful’ prong of the state's Unfair Competition Law. ‘Indeed, I would expect that such a finding would be virtually compelled by the jury's verdict,’ Kralowec said.”)
“Schubert & Reed Gains Class-Action Attorney,” The Daily Journal, January 14, 2008 (“Kimberly A. Kralowec, a plaintiffs' class-action attorney formerly with the Furth Firm in San Francisco for six years, begins at San Francisco's Schubert & Reed at the end of January.”)
“S.F. Firm Gets First Lateral,” The Recorder, January 11, 2008 (“Kralowec was ready to open her own firm, but when a friend connected her with Schubert & Reed, she saw a fit. On Jan. 28 she’ll join the small San Francisco plaintiff shop, established in 1996, as its first-ever lateral partner.”)
“Leveling the Playing Field,” The Daily Journal, May 4, 2007 (“Based on the rapid appearance of conflicting analyses, the Supreme Court decision in Pioneer Electronics likely will have significant consequences in class actions. See, e.g., … Kimberly Kralowec, ‘Thoughts on the Class-Action Aspects of Pioneer Electronics,’ UCL Practitioner, Jan. 25, 2007.”)
“Class-Action Dissonance,” The Daily Journal, March 5, 2007 (“Kimberly A. Kralowec, in her excellent Web log, The UCL Practitioner (www.uclpractitioner.com), heralded Pioneer Electronics as a pro-class-action decision.”)
“Language on Form Spares Lawyer $500,000,” The Daily Journal, February 16, 2007 (“Rava was represented in the sanctions matter by … Section 17200 expert Kimberly A. Kralowec of San Francisco.”)
“Case of the tour-bus kickbacks: bellhops win big settlement,” San Francisco Bay Guardian, January 3, 2007 (“‘How the case was litigated after we filed suit was certainly interesting,’ Kimberly Kralowec, the plaintiffs’ lawyer, told us.”)
“Tour bus companies settle price-fixing suit,” San Francisco Chronicle, August 30, 2006 (“The settlement, to be reviewed today by San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Kramer, would benefit about 1,000 people, plaintiffs’ lawyer Kimberly Kralowec said.”)
“Ruling Renders Prop. 64 Retroactive,” The Recorder, July 25, 2006 (“Kimberly Kralowec, of counsel in The Furth Firm in San Francisco and a recognized expert on Prop 64, called [Mervyn's] a ‘measured decision’ that ‘reached a middle ground.’”)
“Ruling Threatens Consumer Lawsuits,” Los Angeles Times, July 25, 2006 (“Kimberly Kralowec, a San Francisco attorney who handles unfair-competition cases and maintains the blog http://www.uclpractitioner.com, said she was ‘relieved that the broad liability rules seem to be preserved [by the Mervyn’s decision].’ ”)
“Class Actions Hamstrung in Prop 64 Cases,” The Recorder, July 12, 2006 (“Kimberly Kralowec, an of counsel at The Furth Firm in San Francisco who maintains a blog on Prop 64, called the issues addressed in Tuesday’s [Pfizer] ruling the ‘three big ones,’ and believes there’s a chance the opinion could even influence the high court’s thinking on retroactivity.”)
“UCL Suits to Target Illegal Hiring,” The Recorder, July 7, 2006 (“UCL expert Kimberly Kralowec … suggested in an email that … ‘a narrowly-tailored action … might be the best approach.’ ”)
“State's High Court to Untangle Voter-Modified Unfair Competition Law,” San Diego Daily Transcript, Oct. 21, 2005 (“‘The general rule is new legislation applies prospectively only unless there is a clear indication otherwise,’ said Kimberly Kralowec of San Francisco’s Furth Firm[, who] has a blog devoted to the ongoing debate.”)
“Supreme Court Will Decide Prop. 64 Retroactivity,” The Daily Journal, April 28, 2005 (“It was a foregone conclusion that the Supreme Court would resolve the issue, said Kimberly A. Kralowec, a plaintiffs’ lawyer with the Furth Firm who writes a Web log about Proposition 64 and retroactivity. …. ‘It was obvious we needed guidance from the Supreme Court,’ she said. Kralowec added that it is important to resolve the issue as early as possible. ‘If they had waited, these cases would be in limbo longer, and parties would be litigating without knowing if they are litigating on behalf of the general public or not,’ she said.”)
“State High Court to Review Cases in Prop. 64 Flap,” The Recorder, April 28, 2005 (“Kimberly Kralowec, a plaintiff lawyer with the Furth Firm in San Francisco who maintains the 17200blog.com Web site – a de facto clearing house for information on Prop 64 – pointed out Wednesday that the Supreme Court could first decide the question in a separate case that’s been lingering there since 2003.”)
“Clarification" re "Defense Firms Hail Prop. 64,” National Law Journal, February 7, 2005 (“A story on Page 27 of the Dec. 20-27 edition of The National Law Journal, entitled ‘Defense firms hail Prop. 64,’ should have credited a Web log, The UCL Practitioner, http://17200blog.blogspot.com, edited by Kimberly A. Kralowec, with providing some background information for the article, including the approximate number of California firms that sent ‘client alert’ messages.”)
“1st District Rejects Retroactive Use of Initiative on Tort Reform,” The Daily Journal, February 3, 2005 (“The appeals court most likely to address the issue in the immediate future is the 4th District Court of Appeal, which heard oral argument on Proposition 64 in a pair of cases in January, said Kimberly Kralowec, a plaintiffs’ lawyer who writes a Web log about Proposition 64 and retroactivity issues. ... . Plaintiffs’ lawyers cited an advantage to having the first opinion on the subject go their way. ‘On a short-term basis, there’s a huge benefit for plaintiffs,’ Kralowec said. ‘It provides ammunition and clout for plaintiffs in other pending appeals.’”)
“First District Rules Prop 64 Not Retroactive,” The Recorder, February 2, 2005 ("'This [decision] is a victory all around for the plaintiff bar. It's very strongly worded,' said Kimberly Kralowec, a plaintiff lawyer with the Furth Firm whose 17200 Web log has become a popular source of information on retroactivity arguments.")
“Prop 64, In Reverse,” The Recorder, January 24, 2005 ("[W]hen Proposition 64 — which limits the reach of Business & Professional Code § 17200 — passed on Election Day, Kralowec's blog, www.17200blog.com, leaped into the spotlight. The blog and Kralowec, of counsel at The Furth Firm, have quickly become a leading resource in answering Prop 64's $64,000 question: whether the statute is retroactive.")
“Blogging the Law,” Sacramento Bee, January 3, 2005 ("[W]ho knew that a statute of California law ... would be ripe for the blogosphere? Kimberly Kralowec, a San Francisco-based class-action attorney, set up a blog in 2003 that focuses on the state's Unfair Competition Law.... Since [Proposition 64's] passage, the blog (www.17200blog.com) has served as a clearinghouse for California lawyers tracking how Proposition 64 affects cases that predated the initiative.")
“Judge Denies Retroactivity of Proposition 64,” The Daily Journal, January 3, 2005 (“Kramer’s ruling is among more than a dozen superior court decisions that have been issued on the retroactivity issue so far from around the state, according to an online compendium of the cases at www.17200blog.com.”)
“Courts Will Play Role in Effort to Stem Abuse of 17200 Law,” Los Angeles Business Journal, November 29, 2004 ("Kralowec and others believe that the law was used properly, except by a handful of attorneys who abused it. But those abusive cases became notorious ....")
Note, Roxana Mehrfar, "Redefining Commonality for Consumer Class Actions Under California Business and Professions Code Sections 17200 and 17500," 44 Loyola L. A. L. Rev. 353 (Fall 2010)
Robert Carlin, "Chapter 17: Giving San Francisco a Leg to Stand On in UCL Actions," 39 McGeorge L. Rev. 392, 393 n.14 (2008)
Nicole Ochi, "Are Consumer Class and Mass Actions Dead? Complex Litigation Strategies after CAFA and MMTJA," 41 Loy. L. A. L. Rev. 965, 980 n.108 (Spring 2008)
William R. Shafton, "California's Uncommon Common Law Class Action Litigation," 41 Loy. L. A. L. Rev. 783 (Spring 2008)
Saby Ghoshray, "Using Unfair Competition Law to Deter Undocumented Immigration: Examining the Broader Implications of Recent California Litigation," 29 Campbell L. Rev. 233 (Winter 2007)
J. Robert Brown, "Blogs, Law School Rankings, and TheRacetotheBottom.org," University of Denver Sturm College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-33 (July 26, 2007) (available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1003425)
Timothy Sandefur, “The Information Age, Again,” 11 Nexus J. Op. 5, 8-9 (2006)
Bonny E. Sweeney, “Proposition 64 Does Not Apply to Pending Cases,” 14 Competition 11 (2005)
