I hope everyone had a Happy Thanksgiving. Last week, the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One) issued two more unpublished opinions on Prop. 64 retroactivity. Both are consistent with that Division's prior rulings. Privacy Rights Clearinghouse v. JetBlue Airways Corp., no. D045568 (Nov. 22, 2005); Bivens v. Gallery Corp., no. D045557 (Nov. 22, 2005). In a third case before that Division, the Prop. 64 retroactivity issue was raised but not decided. Gutierrez v. Nick Pecoraro Painting & Decorating, Inc., no. D044666 (Nov. 23, 2005).
CONTACT ME
Kimberly A. Kralowec
Kralowec Law, P.C.
3132A 24th Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
Tel: (415) 546-6800
Fax: (415) 546-6801
Web:
www.kraloweclaw.com
Email: [email protected]
Twitter:
@uclpractitioner
About
January 2024
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Categories
- Appellate practice (90)
- Attorneys’ fees (CCP §1021.5) (53)
- Class Action "Fairness" Act (72)
- Class actions - arbitration (185)
- Class actions - certification (314)
- Class actions - choice of law (8)
- Class actions - discovery (15)
- Class actions - general (89)
- Class actions - settlements (60)
- Class actions - Supreme Court (212)
- General (101)
- Kralowec Law, P.C. (3)
- Law blogging (114)
- MCLE programs (154)
- News reports and practice articles (173)
- Prop. 64 - appellate briefs (24)
- Prop. 64 - appellate decisions (30)
- Prop. 64 - general (21)
- Prop. 64 - injury in fact (97)
- Prop. 64 - oral arguments (10)
- Prop. 64 - pending appeals (7)
- Prop. 64 - Supreme Court (73)
- Prop. 64 - trial court orders (3)
- Schubert Jonckheer Kolbe & Kralowec LLP (2)
- Supreme Court and Court of Appeal arguments (86)
- The CLRA (96)
- The Furth Firm LLP (22)
- UCL - "fraudulent" prong (62)
- UCL - "unfair" prong (70)
- UCL - "unlawful" prong (89)
- UCL - arbitration (6)
- UCL - class certification (21)
- UCL - competitor actions (21)
- UCL - federal decisions (49)
- UCL - injunctive relief (26)
- UCL - legislative activity (4)
- UCL - preemption (58)
- UCL - public prosecutor actions (65)
- UCL - remedies in general (101)
- UCL - restitution (44)
- UCL - Supreme Court (132)
FORMER SITE ARCHIVES (17200BLOG.COM)
« New UCL preemption decision: Viva! v. Adidas | Main | Petition for review filed in Schwartz v. Visa »
Monday, November 28, 2005
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Class Actions
The CLRA
Brinker Links
- Plaintiffs' counsel in Brinker receive CLAY Awards (March 2013)
- Supreme Court depublishes third post-Brinker opinion (January 2013)
- Supreme Court depublishes post-Brinker opinions (December 2012)
- "Brinker v. Superior Court: Takeaways for California Workers" by Kimberly Kralowec (July 2012)
- Opinion in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, 53 Cal.4th 1004 (2012)
- Docket in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court
- Briefs in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court
- Oral argument in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (Nov. 8, 2011)
California Appellate Practice Links
- Cal. Rules of Court, Title Eight (Appellate Rules)
- New Appellate Opinions
- Supreme Court Notices of Forthcoming Filings
- Supreme Court Notices of Oral Argument
- Supreme Court Internal Operating Procedures
- Map of California Appellate Districts
- Successful Depublication Requests
- Supreme Court Pending Issues Summary
- California Appellate Courts Case Information
LAW BLOG DIRECTORIES
- Alltop.com law page
- Blawg Directory (ABA Journal)
- Blawg Directory: California (ABA Journal)
- Blawg Republic
- Blawg Search (Justia)
- Blawg.org
- Blogged.com Law Blog Directory
- Blogs & Podcasts (FindLaw)
- Law Professor Blogs (Professor Paul L. Caron)
- LawLink Blog Directory
- LexMonitor
- myHq blawgs (Blawg Review)
- Taxonomy of Legal Blogs (Ian Best)
- The Law List (Kevin O'Keefe)
- USLaw Blog Directory
Disclaimer
Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.
The UCL Practitioner
© 2003-2022
by Kimberly A. Kralowec
All rights reserved.
Header design by Webmotion
Photos by Jack Gescheidt
Powered by TypePad
Follow @uclpractitioner
StatCounter
I was afraid you were going to put that Gallery Corp decision up here. I don't think Judge Huffman appreciates my interpretation of the law.
Posted by: Scott McMillan | Monday, November 28, 2005 at 08:33 PM
Sorry, Scott. Nothing personal. I made a decision back in November of last year (based on the wise advice of my firm's managing partner) to be comprehensive in my coverage, even if what I'm covering might not help the plaintiffs' side. I'm very glad I did. A treatise is useless if it cites only the cases on one side of an issue.
Posted by: Kimberly A. Kralowec | Tuesday, November 29, 2005 at 12:52 PM
Yes, but of course! Sorry if my comment seemed reproachful; it was not intended to be.
Yesterday, the court ordered publication of the decision.
Posted by: Scott McMillan | Thursday, December 08, 2005 at 06:05 AM