On Wednesday, January 4, 2006, the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Seven) applied the traditional formulation of the "fraudulent" prong—"likely to deceive consumers"—in a post-Prop. 64 case. Wayne v. Staples, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jan. 4, 2006). UPDATE: On March 15, 2006, the Supreme Court denied review and depublication. UPDATE: The official citation is Wayne v. Staples, Inc., 135 Cal.App.4th 466 (2006).
Comments