On Wednesday, the Supreme Court declined to review the Court of Appeal's unpublished opinion in Dunham v. Memberworks, case no. A107261 (First Appellate District, Division Five), even though both parties requested it. As I explained here, the Court of Appeal held that Prop. 64 applies retroactively to pending cases, but that the trial court may grant leave to amend to add an affected plaintiff. There is a definite pattern here. The Supreme Court is granting review in Prop. 64 retroactivity cases only if the Court of Appeal's opinion is published.
Comments