In another unpublished opinion, handed down just two days ago, the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division Five) held 2-1 that Prop. 64 applies to pending cases. AICCO, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America, no. A110367. Justice Reardon, who was on the panel in Mervyn's, dissented. The dissent is noteworthy for its discussion of Myers v. Philip Morris Cos., 28 Cal.4th 828 (2002), a case that various courts addressing Prop. 64 retroactivity have interpreted in widely divergent ways. It will be quite interesting to see how the Supreme Court views it.
CONTACT ME
Kimberly A. Kralowec
Kralowec Law, P.C.
3132A 24th Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
Tel: (415) 546-6800
Fax: (415) 546-6801
Web:
www.kraloweclaw.com
Email: [email protected]
Twitter:
@uclpractitioner
About
January 2025
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Categories
- Appellate practice (90)
- Attorneys’ fees (CCP §1021.5) (53)
- Class Action "Fairness" Act (72)
- Class actions - arbitration (185)
- Class actions - certification (314)
- Class actions - choice of law (8)
- Class actions - discovery (15)
- Class actions - general (89)
- Class actions - settlements (60)
- Class actions - Supreme Court (212)
- General (101)
- Kralowec Law, P.C. (3)
- Law blogging (114)
- MCLE programs (155)
- News reports and practice articles (173)
- Prop. 64 - appellate briefs (24)
- Prop. 64 - appellate decisions (30)
- Prop. 64 - general (21)
- Prop. 64 - injury in fact (97)
- Prop. 64 - oral arguments (10)
- Prop. 64 - pending appeals (7)
- Prop. 64 - Supreme Court (73)
- Prop. 64 - trial court orders (3)
- Schubert Jonckheer Kolbe & Kralowec LLP (2)
- Supreme Court and Court of Appeal arguments (86)
- The CLRA (96)
- The Furth Firm LLP (22)
- UCL - "fraudulent" prong (62)
- UCL - "unfair" prong (70)
- UCL - "unlawful" prong (89)
- UCL - arbitration (6)
- UCL - class certification (21)
- UCL - competitor actions (21)
- UCL - federal decisions (49)
- UCL - injunctive relief (26)
- UCL - legislative activity (4)
- UCL - preemption (58)
- UCL - public prosecutor actions (65)
- UCL - remedies in general (101)
- UCL - restitution (44)
- UCL - Supreme Court (132)
FORMER SITE ARCHIVES (17200BLOG.COM)
« MCLE reminder: 2006 Class Action and UCL Conference | Main | "Unfair Competition Law Update: A Look at 2005" »
Friday, May 12, 2006
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Class Actions
The CLRA
Brinker Links
- Plaintiffs' counsel in Brinker receive CLAY Awards (March 2013)
- Supreme Court depublishes third post-Brinker opinion (January 2013)
- Supreme Court depublishes post-Brinker opinions (December 2012)
- "Brinker v. Superior Court: Takeaways for California Workers" by Kimberly Kralowec (July 2012)
- Opinion in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, 53 Cal.4th 1004 (2012)
- Docket in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court
- Briefs in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court
- Oral argument in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (Nov. 8, 2011)
California Appellate Practice Links
- Cal. Rules of Court, Title Eight (Appellate Rules)
- New Appellate Opinions
- Supreme Court Notices of Forthcoming Filings
- Supreme Court Notices of Oral Argument
- Supreme Court Internal Operating Procedures
- Map of California Appellate Districts
- Successful Depublication Requests
- Supreme Court Pending Issues Summary
- California Appellate Courts Case Information
LAW BLOG DIRECTORIES
- Alltop.com law page
- Blawg Directory (ABA Journal)
- Blawg Directory: California (ABA Journal)
- Blawg Republic
- Blawg Search (Justia)
- Blawg.org
- Blogged.com Law Blog Directory
- Blogs & Podcasts (FindLaw)
- Law Professor Blogs (Professor Paul L. Caron)
- LawLink Blog Directory
- LexMonitor
- myHq blawgs (Blawg Review)
- Taxonomy of Legal Blogs (Ian Best)
- The Law List (Kevin O'Keefe)
- USLaw Blog Directory
Disclaimer
Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.
The UCL Practitioner
© 2003-2022
by Kimberly A. Kralowec
All rights reserved.
Header design by Webmotion
Photos by Jack Gescheidt
Powered by TypePad
Follow @uclpractitioner
StatCounter
Just a non-attorney's opinion from Porterville, but the dissenting opinion is correct.
Posted by: Terry Moore | Friday, May 12, 2006 at 09:13 AM
Thanks, Terry!
Posted by: Kimberly | Friday, May 12, 2006 at 09:50 AM