CONTACT ME

January 2025

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

« Blawg Review #100 | Main | Recording of Murphy v. Kenneth Cole oral argument available online »

Saturday, March 24, 2007

Comments

John

I believe the sharing agreement begins July 1. I have not read the article as I am not a subscriber, but I think the creation of a second complex litigation judge/courtroom still requires the approval (and funding) of the AOC. If someone with access could email me the text of the article at john at legalreader dot com I would certainly appreciate it.

Kimberly A. Kralowec

John, I've emailed you a copy of the article. You are right; the article does note that the recommendation was approved by the court's executive committee but it still requires final approval from the Administrative Office of the Courts.

Andrew Sussman

Late last week, I attended a Proposition 65 conference in San
Francisco at which Judge Kramer was a panelist. There was a fair amount of sincere applause when he mentioned that he wouldn't be leaving the complex litigation bench and would be sharing those duties with another judge. However, he didn't indicate when the change would occur.

The comments to this entry are closed.

2023 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2022
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.



  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad


  • StatCounter