• Enter your email address:

October 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

« Supreme Court sets two UCL preemption cases for oral argument: Prachasaisoradej and In re Tobacco Cases II | Main | Trial-level briefs and order interpreting Fireside Bank: In re Cellphone Termination Fee Cases »

Friday, May 11, 2007



I heard it was being pushed back to September.

Kimberly A. Kralowec

According to the docket, a request to reschedule the argument was filed on May 9, but the Court has not yet issued any formal order changing the argument date.

Kelly Chen

Hi Kimberly, I'm planning to attend the argument in LA next week - - unless the argument date has been changed. -Kelly Chen

Kimberly A. Kralowec

The docket now says that the request to reschedule the argument was withdrawn. So, thank you, Kelly, it would be great to receive a report. Please send it to me by email at

Jim Evans

Kimberly: I will be attending the argument next week as well. Best regards, Jim Evans

The comments to this entry are closed.

2020 Supreme Court Calendar



  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.

  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2020
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.

  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad

  • StatCounter