CONTACT ME

SUBSCRIBE


  • Enter your email address:

June 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

« New UCL/class certification decision: Arias v. Superior Court | Main | Supreme Court denies review in class member communication case: Belaire-West Landscaping, Inc. v. Superior Court »

Friday, July 27, 2007

Comments

Kevin Roddy

Just a note of clarification. The trial is a bench trial of Plaintiffs' and Class members' claims for violations of Section 17200 and Section 17500 before Coordination Trial Judge David DeAlba. Plaintiffs dismissed with prejudice their CLRA claim, which would have required a jury trial.

Kimberly A. Kralowec

Thanks, Kevin, that's a helpful clarification.

The comments to this entry are closed.

2020 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2020
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.



  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad


  • StatCounter