CONTACT ME

SUBSCRIBE


  • Enter your email address:

October 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

« New UCL public prosecutor decision: People ex rel. Brown v. PuriTec | Main | Supreme Court issues another "grant and hold" order in a no-class-action arbitration case: Massie v. Ralph's Grocery »

Thursday, August 09, 2007

Comments

Jack Payne

For some reason I am always surprised by the attempts of defendants to "decertify the class" in a case like this. I wonder why this is tried so often. And fails so often.

The comments to this entry are closed.

2020 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2020
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.



  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad


  • StatCounter