CONTACT ME

January 2025

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

« New CLRA and UCL "injury in fact" decision: Buckland v. Threshold Enterprises, Ltd. | Main | Two new attorneys' fees decisions: Cruz v. Ayromloo and Nichols v. City of Taft »

Monday, October 08, 2007

Comments

Will Schendel

You've compiled a great record of consistently high quality work. Keep going!

rb

Happy four year UCL practitioner statute of limitations day!

The comments to this entry are closed.

2023 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2022
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.



  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad


  • StatCounter