January 2023

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

« New Ninth Circuit UCL "likely to deceive" decision: Williams v. Gerber Products Co. | Main | Supreme Court denies review and depublication in class certification case: Bell v. Superior Court (H.F. Cox, Inc.) »

Thursday, April 24, 2008


Paul Herring

As a former Net-flix customer I was elated about getting a free month. I discontinued my account because I could no longer afford the service.

I call Netflix and cashed in on my free 16.99 three at a time subscription.

When the rep asked for a Credit card number he assured me my account would be free for 30 days.

He neglected to tell me that I would have to buy a month in order to get the free month. So it cost me $16 bucks to redeem my $16 award.

But, I guess as long as the lawyers got paid.
We showed them

The comments to this entry are closed.

2023 Supreme Court Calendar



  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.

  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2022
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.

  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad

  • StatCounter