CONTACT ME

January 2025

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

« More amicus letters in support of review in Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court (Benson) | Main | OFF-TOPIC BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court upholds Prop. 8: Strauss v. Horton »

Friday, May 22, 2009

Comments

Larry Golub

Please ntoe that the Supreme Court accepted review of this case on September 9, 2009 and is no longer able to be cited as precedent.

Kimberly A. Kralowec

Thanks, Larry, for posting that update.

The comments to this entry are closed.

2023 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2022
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.



  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad


  • StatCounter