CONTACT ME

SUBSCRIBE


  • Enter your email address:

August 2021

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

« Recent Ninth Circuit class-action-related decisions: Chalk v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., Hunt v. Imperial Merchant Services, Inc., Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp., and Hatfield v. Halifax PLC | Main | Impact of Tobacco on the Walker/G&C Auto Body split in authority »

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Comments

Joshua Daniels

Does anyone see the obvious, abusive contradiction here?? Where was this language when Hertz appealed for jurisdiction on the basis of diversity?

The comments to this entry are closed.

2021 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2020
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.



  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad


  • StatCounter