CONTACT ME

SUBSCRIBE


  • Enter your email address:

October 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

« The opinion is up: In re Tobacco II Cases | Main | "California Supreme Court revives class-action suit against tobacco firms" »

Monday, May 18, 2009

Comments

Scott McMillan

Kimberly, awesome analysis in such a short time. I read the opinion, and then came here for your take on it and your dissection of the detail. I was not disappointed. Thanks for the hard work.

Kimberly A. Kralowec

Thanks, Scott!

The comments to this entry are closed.

2020 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2020
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.



  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad


  • StatCounter