CONTACT ME

January 2025

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

« Registration now open for Oct. 6 Los Angeles County Bar Association program on In re Tobacco II | Main | Review granted in UCL remedies case: Clark v. Superior Court (Nat'l Western Life Ins.) »

Friday, October 02, 2009

Comments

The Complex Litigator

Morgan, et al. v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. (September 23, 2009) directly conflicts with the unnecessary comments in Yabsley related to the CLRA demand timing. If this opinion were brought to the Supreme Court's attention, it might increase the chance for review on that point.

Kimberly A. Kralowec

That is true and an excellent point. Morgan was handed down after I'd already filed my depublication request. There is still time for more depublication requests, or perhaps an amicus letter in support of review could make that point.

Brian Perryman

I believe oppositions to the various depublication requests were filed -- any chance you'd be able to post those as well?

Kimberly A. Kralowec

Yes, I could do that. I'll need to have them scanned. Check back later.

The comments to this entry are closed.

2023 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2022
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.



  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad


  • StatCounter