CONTACT ME

SUBSCRIBE


  • Enter your email address:

August 2021

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Categories

Archives

More...

« Supreme Court denies review in two more post-Tobacco II cases | Main | Thoughts on one aspect of Dukes v. Wal-Mart »

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Blogosphere comment on Dukes v. Wal-Mart

Attorney Steven G. Pearl of The California Wage and Hour Law Blog has had more time to read Dukes v. Wal-Mart than I have.  He has three detailed posts on the opinion. 

Also, a post at a Forbes.com blog called On The Docket discusses the case and asks if Wal-Mart should really be considered "too big to sue." 

Posted by at 09:51 PM |

Comments

Steven G. Pearl

It's just that my case against Wal-Mart, Sepulveda v. Wal-Mart, has been stayed pending Dukes, so I have a little extra interest in it!

Steve Pearl

Posted by: Steven G. Pearl | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:18 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

2022 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2022
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.



  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad


  • StatCounter