CONTACT ME

January 2024

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

« Supreme Court to hand down two opinions of interest today: Clark v. Superior Court and Lu v. Hawaiian Gardens | Main | Three new federal decisions on class action issues: Wolin v. Jaguar Land Rover, Avritt v. Reliastar Life Ins. Co., and Cappuccitti v. DirecTV, Inc. »

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Comments

JennyB

Hi Kim, enjoyed meeting you at Bloggy Boot Camp this weekend! I see from your experience here that you could easily have been one of the speakers.

I think it would be interesting to see how you might use videos on this site. Whether actual courtroom footage or perhaps tutorials, I'm sure they would add even further value to your site. Jessica said all readers are looking for "entertainment".

Good luck to you!

JennyB

Also wanted to know whether you're on Twitter?

Kimberly A. Kralowec

Hi Jenny, thanks for your comments. I think it would be a lot of work to create original video content for the blog and that the ROI would not be high enough. However, I could easily embed relevant video produced by others. Most judges don't allow video cameras in the courtroom, so little actual courtroom footage is available. But this is an interesting idea and one that I'll keep in mind for the future. As for Twitter, I do have an account but have never gotten into the habit of using it regularly.

The comments to this entry are closed.

2023 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2022
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.



  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad


  • StatCounter