This morning, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, ___ U.S. ___ (Jun. 20, 2011). The class certification order has been reversed. More later.
CONTACT ME
Kimberly A. Kralowec
Kralowec Law, P.C.
3132A 24th Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
Tel: (415) 546-6800
Fax: (415) 546-6801
Web:
www.kraloweclaw.com
Email: [email protected]
Twitter:
@uclpractitioner
About
January 2025
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Categories
- Appellate practice (90)
- Attorneys’ fees (CCP §1021.5) (53)
- Class Action "Fairness" Act (72)
- Class actions - arbitration (185)
- Class actions - certification (314)
- Class actions - choice of law (8)
- Class actions - discovery (15)
- Class actions - general (89)
- Class actions - settlements (60)
- Class actions - Supreme Court (212)
- General (101)
- Kralowec Law, P.C. (3)
- Law blogging (114)
- MCLE programs (155)
- News reports and practice articles (173)
- Prop. 64 - appellate briefs (24)
- Prop. 64 - appellate decisions (30)
- Prop. 64 - general (21)
- Prop. 64 - injury in fact (97)
- Prop. 64 - oral arguments (10)
- Prop. 64 - pending appeals (7)
- Prop. 64 - Supreme Court (73)
- Prop. 64 - trial court orders (3)
- Schubert Jonckheer Kolbe & Kralowec LLP (2)
- Supreme Court and Court of Appeal arguments (86)
- The CLRA (96)
- The Furth Firm LLP (22)
- UCL - "fraudulent" prong (62)
- UCL - "unfair" prong (70)
- UCL - "unlawful" prong (89)
- UCL - arbitration (6)
- UCL - class certification (21)
- UCL - competitor actions (21)
- UCL - federal decisions (49)
- UCL - injunctive relief (26)
- UCL - legislative activity (4)
- UCL - preemption (58)
- UCL - public prosecutor actions (65)
- UCL - remedies in general (101)
- UCL - restitution (44)
- UCL - Supreme Court (132)
FORMER SITE ARCHIVES (17200BLOG.COM)
« More on Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co. | Main | U.S. Supreme Court relists Philip Morris v. Jackson »
Monday, June 20, 2011
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Class Actions
The CLRA
Brinker Links
- Plaintiffs' counsel in Brinker receive CLAY Awards (March 2013)
- Supreme Court depublishes third post-Brinker opinion (January 2013)
- Supreme Court depublishes post-Brinker opinions (December 2012)
- "Brinker v. Superior Court: Takeaways for California Workers" by Kimberly Kralowec (July 2012)
- Opinion in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, 53 Cal.4th 1004 (2012)
- Docket in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court
- Briefs in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court
- Oral argument in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (Nov. 8, 2011)
California Appellate Practice Links
- Cal. Rules of Court, Title Eight (Appellate Rules)
- New Appellate Opinions
- Supreme Court Notices of Forthcoming Filings
- Supreme Court Notices of Oral Argument
- Supreme Court Internal Operating Procedures
- Map of California Appellate Districts
- Successful Depublication Requests
- Supreme Court Pending Issues Summary
- California Appellate Courts Case Information
LAW BLOG DIRECTORIES
- Alltop.com law page
- Blawg Directory (ABA Journal)
- Blawg Directory: California (ABA Journal)
- Blawg Republic
- Blawg Search (Justia)
- Blawg.org
- Blogged.com Law Blog Directory
- Blogs & Podcasts (FindLaw)
- Law Professor Blogs (Professor Paul L. Caron)
- LawLink Blog Directory
- LexMonitor
- myHq blawgs (Blawg Review)
- Taxonomy of Legal Blogs (Ian Best)
- The Law List (Kevin O'Keefe)
- USLaw Blog Directory
Disclaimer
Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.
The UCL Practitioner
© 2003-2022
by Kimberly A. Kralowec
All rights reserved.
Header design by Webmotion
Photos by Jack Gescheidt
Powered by TypePad
Follow @uclpractitioner
StatCounter
By a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court asked Kagan, Ginsburg and Sotomayor to make them coffee.
Posted by: Aashish Desai | Tuesday, June 21, 2011 at 05:31 PM
The Supreme Court is continuing their backing of Wall Street and corporate American by allowing sexual bias by Wal-Mart to over ride the rights of American citizens (whom they are by the Constitution supposed to protect). Clarence Thomas and other right wing judges are on the payroll of Wall Street as is Congress. As long as lobby money is allowed to bribe our government officials, we have no country. Only the rich survive.
Posted by: Thomas E. Sheehan | Monday, June 27, 2011 at 05:12 PM