CONTACT ME

SUBSCRIBE


  • Enter your email address:

September 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

« New UCL competitor and Prop. 64 standing opinion: Law Offices of Mathew Higbee v. Expungement Assistance Services | Main | New UCL "unfair" prong opinion: West v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. »

Thursday, March 21, 2013

Comments

Ken

So presumably, such a stipulation would be fine for a PAGA claim to avoid federal subject matter jurisdiction.

The comments to this entry are closed.

2020 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2020
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.



  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad


  • StatCounter