Yesterday's San Francisco Chronicle had this article (subscription) by Bob Egelko on the Court of Appeal's latest UCL and CLRA opinion, Chapman v. Skype Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Oct. 4, 2013).
Chapman stands in rather stark contrast to Simpson v. The Kroger Corp., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Sept. 25, 2013), decided the preceding week (see this blog post). More details on Chapman can be found on Professor Tushnet's blog, which also had a post on Simpson.
Comments