The 23rd annual State Bar Golden State Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Institute will take place next Thursday, October 25 October 24, 2013 at the Julia Morgan Ballroom in San Francisco. [UPDATED: Please note that the correct date is Thursday, October 24th (not Friday the 25th).]
This is going to be a really interesting event, and I would encourage everyone who handles UCL and CLRA matters to sign up and attend. During the afternoon, yours truly will be moderating a panel on UCL and CLRA trials. The panel will feature the attorneys who tried the McAdams v. Monier class action (discussed here, here and here) earlier this year. McAdams resulted in one of the nine published post-Tobacco II appellate opinions, in which the Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's order denying class certification.
When McAdams went to trial, the defendant was represented by Will Stern of MoFo, author of the Rutter Group guide on 17200 practice. Attorney Jeff Cereghino of Ram Olson Cereghino & Kopczynski represented the plaintiffs. They and I have had several preparatory calls, and I have already learned some facsinating things about the practical aspects of taking a class action case to trial in the post-Dukes and post-Duran world. We will be talking about the jury instructions, the special verdict, the post-trial ruling (it was a remarkable one), and more.
In addition to that panel, the morning update session will cover UCL developments (in addition to antitrust ones), and the big-stakes trials panel will be of interest to anyone who tries class action cases.
If that is not enough to tempt you, at lunchtime, we will be welcoming California Supreme Court Justice Goodwin Liu as our keynote speaker. I am very much looking forward to hearing his remarks.
And last but not least, at the dinner, we will honor Senior Assistant Attorney General Kathleen E. Foote, of the California Department of Justice, who has been named 2013 Antitrust Lawyer of the Year. Ms. Foote is only the second woman to be so honored in the history of the award.
I hope to see you there. The complete schedule for the day appears below. Click here to register.
8 a.m. - 9 a.m. |
Registration & Continental Breakfast |
8:30 a.m. - 8:45 a.m. |
General Session
|
8:45 a.m. - 10:15 a.m. |
Plenary Session #1 This popular panel returns once again this year. Our dynamic speakers will provide an overview of recent California and federal developments in antitrust and unfair competition law.
|
10:15 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. |
Morning Break |
10:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. |
Plenary Session #2: Trials For years, very few large antitrust cases went to trial let alone reached a jury verdict. That era has changed. We have witnessed an abundance of high stakes antitrust jury trials in the past couple of years. Last year, trial lawyers from two of these important cases, USA v. AU Optronics and Rambus v. Micron and Hynix, spoke to us about trial challenges they faced and how they addressed them. This year we are again very fortunate to have some of the country’s leading antitrust trial lawyers tell us about their recent trial experiences and, importantly, lessons they learned that will benefit litigators on both sides of a case as well as the in-house lawyers and clients overseeing antitrust litigation. The trials on our agenda for this year are: In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation In March 2013, a federal court jury in Brooklyn, New York, returned a $54.1 million verdict (trebled to $162.3 million) in favor of a class of vitamin C buyers. Plaintiffs claimed that the defendants, four Chinese producers of vitamin.C, conspired to fix prices and production levels for vitamin C exported to the United States. A key part of their defense was that their prices were set at the direction of the Chinese government. In re TFT-LCD Antitrust Litigation / Direct Purchasers Class v. Toshiba In July 2012, a San Francisco federal court jury found Toshiba liable for participating in an international price fixing cartel in violation of the Sherman Act. This trial was one of the first direct purchaser antitrust class actions to be tried to a jury in a long time. Plaintiffs claimed that Toshiba conspired with other international manufacturers to fix the prices at which LCDs were sold. The jury agreed, finding for the plaintiffs and awarding $87 million. In re Urethanes Antitrust Litigation / Direct Purchasers Class v. Dow Chemical In February 2013, a federal court jury in Kansas returned a verdict in favor of a class of purchasers of urethanes for $400 million (trebled to $1.2 billion). Post-trial motions and briefing are underway. Co-moderators:
Panelists:
|
12:30 p.m. - 2 p.m. |
Golden State Institute Luncheon Luncheon Keynote Speaker: Hon. Goodwin Liu, Associate Justice of the California Supreme Court - San Francisco, CA We are honored to have Justice Liu, the newest member of our state’s highest court, join us to present his keynote address. |
2:15 p.m. - 3 p.m. |
Plenary Session #3: Antitrust and IP The U.S. Supreme Court issued a watershed ruling this summer on “reverse payment” settlements -- settlements of pharmaceutical patent litigation in which a branded drug company compensates a generic entrant to delay its entry into the market. In FTC v. Actavis, the Court held these agreements are to be analyzed using the Rule of Reason, not a presumption of unlawfulness or lawfulness. Our distinguished panelists will discuss the Court’s opinion and what it means for litigation challenging these agreements, patent litigation settlements, and the pharmaceutical industry and beyond, as well as for the California Supreme Court’s decision in the pending Cipro case. Our panelists include the attorney who argued Actavis in the Supreme Court, the leading academician on the subject, trial counsel in Cipro and other class action challenges to reverse settlements, and is moderated by the attorney who filed the Actavis Case. Moderator: Cheryl L. Johnson, Office of California Attorney General - Los Angeles, CA Panelists:
|
2:15 p.m. - 3 p.m. |
Plenary Session #4: Unfair Competition Law and Consumers Legal Remedies Act - Class Certification Issues and Trial Techniques for UCL and CLRA Class Actions This outstanding panel is comprised of lead plaintiffs’ and defense counsel from McAdams v. Monier, Inc., a UCL/CLRA trial that went to verdict earlier this year. The plaintiffs consisted of a certified class of 128,000 members who sought more $250 million. The trial court overturned a $7.4 million plaintiffs’ verdict after rejecting their expert’s testimony. Our panelists will discuss the issues they faced regarding class certification, as well as how they presented their liability case and damages and restitution theories. The panel includes the author of The Rutter Group’s UCL treatise and is moderated by the author of the “The UCL Practitioner” blog and plaintiffs’ oral advocate before the California Supreme Court in Brinker. Moderator Kimberly Kralowec, The Kralowec Law Group - San Francisco, CA Panelists:
|
3:45 p.m. - 4 p.m. |
Afternoon Break |
4 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. |
Plenary Session #5: Judge's Panel A distinguished group of state and federal judges will discuss certification of class actions and other pretrial and trial proceedings in complex litigation. The focus will be their “real world” experiences and practice pointers. This is a unique opportunity to learn directly from these highly experienced state and federal judges who adjudicate major class actions, antitrust and unfair competition cases, and other complex business litigation. Moderator: Penny Preovolos, Morrison & Foerster LLP - San Francisco, CA Panelists:
|
5:30 p.m. - 7 p.m. |
Reception for Antitrust Lawyer of the Year – Hosted Reception |
7 p.m. - 9:30 p.m. |
Antitrust Lawyer of the Year Award Dinner and Program Honoree Kathleen E. Foote, Senior Assistant Attorney General, California Department of Justice |
Comments