The UCL and secondary liability: Daniels v. Select Portfolio Services, Inc.

In an opinion handed down in April of this year, the Court of Appeal (Sixth Appellate District) reconfirmed the rule that UCL liability can be predicated on an agency or conspiracy theory.  Daniels v. Select Portfolio Services, Inc., 246 Cal.App.4th 1150, 1188 (2016) (citing People v. JTH Tax, Inc., 212 Cal.App.4th 1219, 1242 (2013); People v. Bestline Products, Inc., 61 Cal.App.3d 879, 918-19 (1976)). 

This blog's discussion of People v. JTH Tax, Inc. is available at this link.  People v. Bestline Products was a little before the blog's time, but see this post for a discussion of more recent decisions on aiding and abetting liability under UCL.