CONTACT ME

January 2025

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Categories

Archives

More...

« Ninth Circuit considers CLRA attorneys' fees: Gonzales v. CarMax Auto Superstores, LLC | Main | Supreme Court takes up UCL standing case: Goonewardene v. ADP »

Wednesday, February 08, 2017

Could Nordstrom invoke the UCL over a Trump tweet?

I was asked this question today by a Politico reporter, and was subsequently quoted in his article, "Trump blasts Nordstrom for dropping Ivanka's clothing line." 

Although I have other serious concerns about this type of tweet by a sitting president, I have a hard time seeing a UCL claim for Nordstrom in this fact pattern.   The article sums up why.   (Welcome, Politico readers!)

Posted by at 01:38 PM in News reports and practice articles |

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.

2023 Supreme Court Calendar


Research


Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.


  • The UCL Practitioner
    © 2003-2022
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.



  • Header design by Webmotion
    Photos by Jack Gescheidt
    Powered by TypePad


  • StatCounter